Path: utzoo!attcan!dptcdc!denise
From: denise@dptcdc.toronto.datapoint.com (S. Denise Neufer)
Newsgroups: can.general
Subject: Re: Unix Review braindamaged subscription offer
Keywords: Unix_Review, advertising, money, unfair
Message-ID: <628@dptcdc.toronto.datapoint.com>
Date: 21 Jun 89 21:21:11 GMT
References: <1989Jun13.175628.28031@telly.on.ca> <391@moegate.UUCP> <2041@egvideo.UUCP> <142.1@unifax.UUCP>
Reply-To: denise@dptcdc.toronto.datapoint.com (S. Denise Neufer)
Distribution: can
Organization: Datapoint Canada, Toronto, ON
Lines: 22

In article <142.1@unifax.UUCP> sl@unifax.UUCP (Stuart Lynne) writes:
>>I guess the choice here is up to UNIX Review.  All we have to do is point
>>out the alternatives to them.
>
>In the meantime if you want to complain direct:
>
>	uunet!beast!editor

While at USENIX last week I happened to talk to a person that writes
for Unix Review.  I asked him about this controversy and his
explanation was that Unix Review is owned by a larger company that
has a policy on the free subscriptions that they must adhere to.
He also said, they (the people at Unix Review) are trying to get
this changed.  He acknowledged that several people had sent e-mail
and that they were hoping these letters when shown to the higher
ups would help to convince them.  I just thought that those of you
that have written might like to hear that your letter may make a
difference.

Denise Neufer
denise@datapoint.com
{utzoo,uunet}!dptcdc!denise