Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!bionet!ig!arizona!gln From: gln@arizona.edu (Gary L. Newell) Newsgroups: comp.cog-eng Subject: Re: Typing versus Handwriting Summary: a few points Keywords: typewriting keyboards handwriting tablets Message-ID: <11738@megaron.arizona.edu> Date: 15 Jun 89 08:40:26 GMT References: <1440001@hp-ptp.HP.COM> <11581@megaron.arizona.edu> <2203@trantor.harris-atd.com> Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson Lines: 38 In article <2203@trantor.harris-atd.com>, chuck@melmac.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) writes: > I would like to see a computer which could read my handwriting, since a > lot of the time, *I* can't read my writing. My handwriting was never good, > and since I find myself typing almost everything I need to write, my hand- >writing has atrophied to the point where I have a hard time remembering certain > little used cursive letters, like capital Q. If I want to be clear, I print, A few interesting points - first, it isn't clear how recognition is effected by legibility - most recognition methods use stroke counts and direction changes or stroke sequences etc. to recognize characters - it may be that a system could actually recognize 'what you meant' to draw better than you or I. Secodn, cursive recognizers are pretty bad (in my opinion), even most recognizers of printing require that the user print in boxes, and many require that the letters all be uppercase etc.... > which is horribly slow and tedious. When I write out greeting cards and the > like, I usually have hand cramps after about 15 lines of text. Now that I > can reach my parents via e-mail, I don't even need to write letters. This is what I tried to point out in my last posting - a stylus/tablet interface is simply a very poor idea for applications with a large percentage of text entry. Editting, spreadsheets, some formula writing, are better applications for these systems (assuming that human factors problems along with hardware problems are overcome and a reasonable system appears). > My use of computers has evolved along similar lines. When I started out, > I would write out programs in longhand, and then type them in (on an ASR-33 > teletype at 110 baud!). After a while, I would just note down psuedo-code, > and convert to real code as I typed. Finally, I just started composing code > on the fly. I haven't put a line of code on paper in about six years. This seems to be more common than I thought - I used this 'creative method' myself and it seems that during a design phase or initial creation, it is common for people to use pen/paper due to a variety of properties - it seems that gestural interfaces may also be effective in this area. gln