Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!amdcad!ncpjmw From: ncpjmw@amdcad.AMD.COM (Mike Wincn) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Re: 10BASET did not pass Message-ID: <26084@amdcad.AMD.COM> Date: 23 Jun 89 01:02:41 GMT References: Reply-To: ncpjmw@amdcad.UUCP (Mike Wincn) Organization: Advanced Micro Devices Lines: 17 In article ron@hardees.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) writes: >I just got a call relayed to me that the 10BASET draft >didn't pass the draft vote. Something to do with concerns >over adjacent pair interference problems. > >Somebody on the committee care to elaborate (a longer report >from my contacts is supposedly on the way). > >-Ron I don't know what you mean by '..didn't pass the draft vote.' It was voted overwhelmingly to go out for letter ballot at the New Orleans Plenary, and 10BASE-T Task Force just spent three days reviewing ballot comments. Mike Wincn ncpjmw@amdcad.AMD.COM (408) 749-3156