Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!elroy!gryphon!vector!telecom-gateway
From: ron@ron.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: NNX, N1X, N0X etc.
Message-ID: <telecom-v09i0198m03@vector.dallas.tx.us>
Date: 13 Jun 89 14:38:02 GMT
Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 7
Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us
X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 198, message 3 of 6

The numbering plan as found in Bell's Engineering and Operation
in the Bell System book explicitly lists N as { 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 }
rather than "pick this number carefully."  The description of the
plan shows the transition from the N{0,1}X-NNX numbering plan to
the (then) future generic XXX-XXX numbering.

-Ron