Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!netsys!vector!telecom-gateway From: cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Wilmington <--> 215-347 Message-ID: Date: 22 Jun 89 15:14:12 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Lines: 8 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 209, message 2 of 6 I have heard that in the latest batch of phone bills sent to the Wilmington (Del.) exchange, there was a note saying that a certain bug had been corrected. The bug was that 347-xxxx dialed from a Wilmington phone would make a local call to Unionville, Pa. on 215-347 prefix. Unionville is just north of Kennett Square (uses 215-444, which IS supposed to be a 7-digit local call from Wilmington, although a recent message from me to telecom indicated 11 digits for the local call the other way around). 347-xxxx from Wilmington is supposed to have NO meaning that I know of.