Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!wiley!poseidon!simpson
From: simpson@poseidon.uucp (Scott Simpson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Call of constructors by vectors
Message-ID: <5025@wiley.UUCP>
Date: 13 Jun 89 03:58:05 GMT
References: <1904@mas1.UUCP> <6590146@hplsla.HP.COM>
Sender: news@wiley.UUCP
Reply-To: simpson@poseidon.UUCP (Scott Simpson)
Organization: TRW Arcadia Project
Lines: 30

>	simpleCType x1;
>
>has no need to do such.  
>A better question is why does:
>
>	SomeClass x[100];
>
>with:
>
>inline SomeClass::SomeClass(){}
>
>cause 100 invocations of this do-nothing "initializer" whereas x1 does not
>cause even 1 invocation of the do-nothing "initializer".

.
.
.
.
.  Stupid inews line count "feature"
.
.
.
.
.
Because the SomeClass initializer may do a "new" and you want 100 objects 
allocated.  See Stroustrup section 5.5.5 page 162.  What do I win? :-)
	Scott Simpson
	TRW Space and Defense Sector
	oberon!trwarcadia!simpson  	(UUCP)
	trwarcadia!simpson@usc.edu	(Internet)