Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!botter!star.cs.vu.nl!maart
From: maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re^2: address of function
Message-ID: <2750@piraat.cs.vu.nl>
Date: 13 Jun 89 17:25:20 GMT
References: <2700@solo8.cs.vu.nl> <370@msor0.UUCP> <13685@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Organization: V.U. Informatica, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Lines: 15

karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
\...
\	int  this[100], (*that)[100] = &this;
\which is analogous to
\	int  foo(void), (*bar)(void) = &foo;
\
\This particular symmetry holds only if the explicit "&" is used.  Writing
\"this" without the ampersand yields the same as "&this", but writing "foo"
\without the ampersand yields "&foo[0]", which is not the same as "&foo".
\(Though they will compare equal if brought to a common type.)

Ahum Karl, typo: this <-> foo.
-- 
"I HATE arbitrary limits, especially when |Maarten Litmaath @ VU Amsterdam:
   they're small."  (Stephen Savitzky)    |maart@cs.vu.nl, mcvax!botter!maart