Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!chaynes
From: chaynes@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Chris Haynes)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Subject: Re: "unspecified" and SET!
Message-ID: <CHAYNES.89Jun21174744@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: 21 Jun 89 22:47:44 GMT
References: <10160.890620.ALAN@ML.AI.MIT.EDU> <8906212117.AA20117@sesame.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: Indiana University
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: mkatz@SESAME.STANFORD.EDU's message of 21 Jun 89 21:17:54 GMT


   From: mkatz@SESAME.STANFORD.EDU (Morris Katz)
   Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
   Date: 21 Jun 89 21:17:54 GMT
   ...
   P.S.  After the meeting at Snowbird, Guy Steele and I came to an agreement as
	 to the correct of the two conflicting semantics for multiple values to
	 continuations that we proposed.  At that time, we believed that this
	 solution would probably be acceptable to the great majority of the
	 community.  Is there interest in having the proposal written up for
	 future consideration?  I would be willing to strain my memory in an
	 attempt to creat such a proposal if there is genuine interest.

I'm interested.