Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bionet!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!albanycs!crdgw1!uunet!mcvax!ukc!pyrltd!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald
From: ronald@ibmpcug.UUCP (Ronald Khoo)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mush
Subject: Re: Official Patch #4 for Mush 6.5
Message-ID: <10924@ibmpcug.UUCP>
Date: 15 Jun 89 18:33:05 GMT
References: <3183@ogccse.ogc.edu>
Reply-To: Ronald.Khoo@ibmpcug.CO.UK (Anyone EVER use the Reply-To: ? :-)
Organization: The IBM PC User Group, UK.
Lines: 23

Hi - I just applied the patch, and IMMEDIATELY (sigh) two things crop up
strange.

In article <3183@ogccse.ogc.edu> schaefer@cse.ogc.edu (Barton E. Schaefer) writes:
>mail.c:
>    New mail option -E to edit outgoing headers without $edit_hdrs.
but the default headers are not included in the edit file...
[looks like line 434 in mail.c needs an additional ison(flgs, EDIT_HDRS)]

>+ Listing of commands generated by "?" now sorted down columns instead of
>+ across rows.
And the last item printed is '(null)' - has ?printf %s been passed a NULL ?

Config: standard SCO Xenix 386 2.2.3 + HOMEMAIL; smail, so NO_COMMAS, dotlock.

Sorry I haven't got time to hack the '(null)' problem this week...
Anyone wanna be a hero?

-- 
Ronald Khoo @ The IBM PC User Group, PO Box 360, Harrow HA1 4LQ
Phone:	+44 -1- 863 1191			Domain:	ronald@ibmpcug.CO.UK
Path:	...!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!ronald    	Fax:    +44 -1- 863 6095
              My Opinions? Sell 'em if you can. See if I care!