Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ficc!cliff
From: cliff@ficc.uu.net (cliff click)
Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: TRON (a little long)
Message-ID: <4570@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 15 Jun 89 16:39:40 GMT
References: <382@h.cs.wvu.wvnet.edu> <32424@apple.Apple.COM> <3973@eos.UUCP>
Organization: Ferranti International Controls
Lines: 16

In article <3973@eos.UUCP>, eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya) writes:
> The same can also sort of be said about the OS.  I have attended
> two IEEE COMPCON sessions and have scanned the Proceedings as well.

Is this the considered opinion of the US then?  TRON is poorly designed
hardware AND software?  I guess I'm giving the Japanese more credit than 
that; the mass mind approach carries a lot of weight.

I'm afraid what I know of TRON comes from the Byte article and perhaps one 
other article.  I would very much like to know what the state of TRON is,
where their at and where their heading.

-- 
Cliff Click, Software Contractor at Large
Business: uunet.uu.net!ficc!cliff, cliff@ficc.uu.net, +1 713 274 5368 (w).
Disclaimer: lost in the vortices of nilspace...       +1 713 568 3460 (h).