Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!lib!tusun2!rlk
From: rlk@tusun2.knet.utulsa.edu ( Richard L. Kruse II)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Best TCP/IP for a VAX running VMS
Keywords: TCP/IP
Message-ID: <1055@tusun2.knet.utulsa.edu>
Date: 16 Jun 89 20:48:06 GMT
Reply-To: rlk@tusun2.knet.utulsa.edu ( Richard L. Kruse II)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Tulsa,  Tulsa, Oklahoma
Lines: 27


About two weeks ago I posted a query as to the "best" TCP/IP
implementation to use on a VAX 6320. I failed to mention that
we would be running VMS. As promised, here is the summary of
the replies I received. Thanks very much to all responders;
you have given us some very useful information, as although
we have not made our decision yet, I feel that we have enough
information to make a sensible decision...

The top vendors of choice here look like Wollongong and TGV.
I received a roughly one-for-one recommendation between these
two vendor's products (WIN/TCP and MultiNet, respectively).
I also had a few plugs for Fusion, Process and Ultrix.

As I'm not sure of the correct "netiqette" for posting
summaries, I will stop there. Anyone interested in more
detail should send me mail, and I will gladly send them more
of the details.

Anyone who can give me some guidelines for the *correct* way
to post a summary, please do so! If I missed the boat totally,
I could be talked into a better (read longer) summary...

Hope this helps

Rick Kruse
University of Tulsa