Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!opel!johnk
From: johnk@opel.UUCP (John Kennedy)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: code reviews
Message-ID: <116@opel.UUCP>
Date: 18 Jun 89 20:26:37 GMT
References: <12047@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: johnk@opel.UUCP (John Kennedy)
Organization: Second Source, Inc., Annapolis, MD
Lines: 18

In article <12047@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael Zehr) writes:
[...]
>
>Since part of my job here is to improve programmer productivity, i'm
>interested in eventually implementing some sort of procedure for
>periodic peer reviews.  Does anyone have suggestions or
>reccommendations?
>
>michael j zehr


I can't help but chuckle when I see code reviews and productivity in the
same paragraph.  It's good for the project, it's what the customer wants,
but be assured that it's an increase in overhead and a decrease in productivity.

I wish this weren't true.

John