Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!longway!std-unix From: std-unix@longway.TIC.COM (Moderator, John S. Quarterman) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: C-ISAM as formal standard? If so, by whom? Message-ID: <358@longway.TIC.COM> Date: 12 Jun 89 19:24:13 GMT References: <357@longway.TIC.COM> Reply-To: uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!glee (Godfrey Lee) Organization: Cognos Inc., Ottawa, Canada Lines: 33 Approved: jsq@longway.tic.com (Moderator, John S. Quarterman) From: uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!glee (Godfrey Lee) In article <357@longway.TIC.COM> Dominic Dunlop writes: >Does anybody out there know if the venerable C-ISAM interface has been >adopted, or is about to be adopted, by any public standards body (ANSI, >ISO, IEEE, UL... you name it) > [....] As far >as I'm aware, the current state of play is that C-ISAM has beached in the >X/Open Portability Guide, but no public body has tried to pick it up from >there. X/Open has not beached C-ISAM, but has instead firmed up the specs. Quoted from the X/Open Portability Guide Issue 3 which I received about a month ago: The X/Open ISAM definition is a major subset of the specification of C-ISAM product, version 2.10, published by Informix Software Inc. of Menlo Park, California. In Issues 1 & 2, certain implementation specific features were dropped, for example, audit trail and decimal datatypes. In Issue 3, more detailed descriptions of locking and error handling were provided, as well as minor changes to accomodate ANSI COBOL standards. As far as I know, Informix has said that they will conform with X/Open, and other vendors are coming out with compatible versions of X/Open ISAM. -- Godfrey Lee P.O. Box 9707 Cognos Incorporated 3755 Riverside Dr. VOICE: (613) 738-1338 x3802 FAX: (613) 738-0002 Ottawa, Ontario UUCP: uunet!mitel!sce!cognos!glee CANADA K1G 3Z4 Volume-Number: Volume 16, Number 54