Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!usc!pollux.usc.edu!papa
From: papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: I wanna have a DOSGate!
Keywords: Citadel, DOSGate, door, bbs
Message-ID: <17825@usc.edu>
Date: 13 Jun 89 22:31:26 GMT
References: <16317@gryphon.COM> <5866@microsoft.UUCP> <682@madnix.UUCP> <6013@microsoft.UUCP> <17575@louie.udel.EDU>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Reply-To: papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa)
Distribution: na
Organization: Felsina Software, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 14

In article <17575@louie.udel.EDU> new@udel.EDU (Darren New) writes:
>Am I correct in assuming that all the multi-port serial boards available
>now or in the near future will have an interface identical to the 
>serial.device except for possibly the name and/or unit number on the
>Open() call?

Yes. If they don't have an interface identical to the serial.device, then they
do not conform to CBM published multi-serial standard.

-- Marco Papa 'Doc'
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
uucp:...!pollux!papa       BIX:papa       ARPAnet:pollux!papa@oberon.usc.edu
 "There's Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Diga!" -- Leo Schwab [quoting Rick Unland]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=