Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:30190 comp.sys.intel:860
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!mslater
From: mslater@cup.portal.com (Michael Z Slater)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: 80286, 80386 LOADALL instructions.
Message-ID: <19466@cup.portal.com>
Date: 14 Jun 89 18:43:51 GMT
References: <30105@conexch.UUCP> <213@guardian.UUCP> <19154@cup.portal.com> <226@guardian.UUCP>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 24

>>Incidentally, I published full details on the 286 loadall in the Oct. 87
>>issue of Microprocessor Report. [...]  Also, if Intel
>>gives the info to some companies and not others, it creates an unfair
>>situation.
>>
>>Michael Slater, Editor and Publisher, Microprocessor Report
>>550 California Ave., Suite 320, Palo Alto, CA 94306
>>mslater@cup.portal.com   415/494-2677  fax: 415/494-3718
>
>I assume you only give the information in "Microprocessor Report" to
>some companies and not others (like the ones who pay for it)?  Do you
>suppose this creates an unfair situation?  ;->
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Peter Plamondon, Intel Corp, 5200 NE Elam Young Pkwy, Hillsboro, OR  97124-6497

Come now, you can't be serious?  There is a world of difference between
making information available to anyone that will pay a modest fee, as
compared to refusing to provide the information at all (as Intel has done).

Incidentally, the full text of my Sept. 87 article was posted to the net,
although this was done without my permission and without attribution.  I
wouldn't really object if the poster had at least given credit.

Michael Slater, Microprocessor Report    mslater@cup.portal.com