Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!stel
From: stel@tank.uchicago.edu (stelios  valavanis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Virus thought
Message-ID: <4018@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 22 Jun 89 16:27:35 GMT
Reply-To: stel@tank.uchicago.edu (stelios  valavanis)
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 13

With all this talk about this virus and that virus eliminator, and
with this resource that some curing progs put into the sys to prevent
virus, I got to thinking (dangerous).  Couldn't a virus call itself by
the name of this friendly anti-virus resource replacing the good one
if it is there?  For that metter, couldn't a virus replace any good
resource anywhere with itself (naming itself with the benign name of
course)?  Do I understand what's going on?  Has anybody thought of
this?  I hope so.  I don't want to open Pandora's box!
stel
-- 
Bitnet:	stel%tank.uchicago.edu@uchimvs1.bitnet | i don't know
Internet: 		stel@tank.uchicago.edu | YOU don't know?
uucp:	     ...!uunet!mimsy!oddjob!tank!stel  | ok, so i don't know