Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ukc!axion!fulcrum!tjo
From: tjo@Fulcrum.BT.CO.UK (Tim Oldham)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Is there any wordprocessor in unix
Message-ID: <202@cat.Fulcrum.BT.CO.UK>
Date: 23 Jun 89 11:42:08 GMT
References: <7868@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <18218@mimsy.UUCP>
Reply-To: tjo@fulcrum.bt.co.uk (Tim Oldham)
Organization: BT IT Systems, Birmingham, England
Lines: 16

In article <18218@mimsy.UUCP> chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>My favourite definition [of `word processor'] is:
>
>	A food processor does to food what a word processor does to
>	words.

Is this why editors run in uncooked mode? What does this make
the cooked mode line editors? What mode would a fridge run in?	:-)

Sorry, I just couldn't resist that one.

	Tim.
-- 
Tim Oldham      tjo@fulcrum.bt.co.uk  or  ...!mcvax!ukc!axion!fulcrum!tjo
#include	<stdisclaim>
Why have coffee, when caffeine tastes this good?