Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!elroy!ucla-cs!uci-ics!nagel@paris.ics.uci.edu From: nagel@paris.ics.uci.edu (Mark Nagel) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Live News & Professional Electronic Publications in USENET Format Message-ID: <18057@paris.ics.uci.edu> Date: 16 Jun 89 22:32:17 GMT References: <3492@looking.on.ca> <4494@ficc.uu.net> <WISNER.89Jun11121944@anableps.berkeley.edu> <307@lawnet.LawNet.Com> <WISNER.89Jun12135437@anableps.berkeley.edu> <17588@paris.ics.uci.edu> <141@unifax.UUCP> Sender: news@paris.ics.uci.edu Reply-To: nagel@paris.ics.uci.edu (Mark Nagel) Organization: University of California, Irvine - Dept of ICS Lines: 27 In-reply-to: sl@unifax.UUCP (Stuart Lynne) In article <141@unifax.UUCP>, sl@unifax (Stuart Lynne) writes: |Second I seem to remember that you will be able to get a clarinet feed from |uunet. Rick Adams works (organized,founded etc) uunet. I guess he's aware of |what's going on. Yes, I've been made aware of this. Obviously he doesn't mind. |Why don't you let Rick protect his own interests. I'm sure he will speak up |if he thinks it's worth commenting on. I wasn't trying to protect Rick; I'm sure he is quite capable. I was trying more to point out that Brad will be earning money due to the combined efforts of many people over the years, all of whom volunteered their time and/or software for the good of the net. (Brad included, of course, for his enormous investment in r.h.f). I do not think that Brad is wrong to do what he is doing. I classify his actions similarly to the way in which I view most shareware. If it works out, then great for Brad and all his subscribers. But it's too bad he doesn't feel that doing something for the net just for that reason is good enough. Mark Nagel @ UC Irvine, Department of Information and Computer Science +----------------------------------------+ ARPA: nagel@ics.uci.edu | radiation: smog with an attitude | UUCP: ucbvax!ucivax!nagel | |