Xref: utzoo news.groups:10313 news.admin:6049
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!oliveb!ames!ll-xn!olsen
From: olsen@XN.LL.MIT.EDU (Jim Olsen)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: More on Moderated news.group
Message-ID: <1444@xn.LL.MIT.EDU>
Date: 22 Jun 89 14:00:51 GMT
References: <3497@ncar.ucar.edu>
Reply-To: olsen@xn.ll.mit.edu (Jim Olsen)
Organization: MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA
Lines: 7

Greg Woods' revised proposal, set forth in article <3497@ncar.ucar.edu>,
seems quite reasonable to me.

The only remaining question I see is the group name.  In my opinion,
news.announce.groups makes the most sense, but a name like
news.groups.proposals would be acceptable.  Could someone explain why they
don't want the new group in the news.announce heirarchy?