Xref: utzoo news.groups:10317 news.admin:6054
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!ames!apple!jdevoto
From: jdevoto@Apple.COM (Jeanne A. E. DeVoto)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: More on Moderated news.group
Message-ID: <32608@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 22 Jun 89 20:09:24 GMT
References: <3497@ncar.ucar.edu> <1444@xn.LL.MIT.EDU>
Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA
Lines: 15

In article <1444@xn.LL.MIT.EDU> olsen@xn.ll.mit.edu (Jim Olsen) writes:
>The only remaining question I see is the group name.  In my opinion,
>news.announce.groups makes the most sense, but a name like
>news.groups.proposals would be acceptable.  Could someone explain why they
>don't want the new group in the news.announce heirarchy?

Primarily because news.groups and news.[groups.proposals|announce.groups]
will be so closely coupled. Given this, it seems reasonable to put them
in the same hierarchy. They'll be next to each other in /usr/lib/news/active,
new users who see one group won't have to hunt for the other, et cetera.
====== jeanne a. e. devoto =================================================
                                            | You may not distribute this
jdevoto@apple.com                           | article under a compilation
jdevoto@well.UUCP                           | copyright without my permission.