Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kddlab!titcca!sragwa!wsgw!socslgw!diamond!diamond
From: diamond@diamond.csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: In Moderation: A Moderator's Response
Message-ID: <10348@socslgw.csl.sony.JUNET>
Date: 12 Jun 89 02:50:25 GMT
References: <41197@bbn.COM> <12113@well.UUCP>
Sender: news@csl.sony.JUNET
Reply-To: diamond@csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond)
Organization: Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan
Lines: 12

In article <12113@well.UUCP> Jef Poskanzer <pokey@well.sf.ca.us> writes:

>Other issue: editing someone's message without their consent is, of
>course, inexcusable.

Oh?  Would it be necessary to quote your entire article, unedited, just
to ask if this is really true?

--
Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Lab (diamond%csl.sony.co.jp@relay.cs.net)
 The above opinions are my own.  However, if you see this at Waterloo, Stanford,
 or Anterior, then their administrators must have approved of these opinions.