Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ulysses!andys
From: andys@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Andy Sherman)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: In Moderation network: how's my .signature?
Summary: easy to beat
Message-ID: <11663@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 14 Jun 89 13:05:03 GMT
References: <1106@servax0.essex.ac.uk>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: andys@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com (Andy Sherman)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories - Murray Hill, NJ
Lines: 20
In-reply-to: alan@essex.ac.uk (Stanier A)

In article <1106@servax0.essex.ac.uk>, alan@essex (Stanier A) writes:
>   So I have designed myself a new .signature, which I think will stop
>the IN MODERATION people from including my articles in their feed. I
>do not know if the wording will give legitimate USENET readers any
>problems. Can anyone out there advise, or give a better wording?
>   Thanx
>
>            Alan  M  Stanier                   copyright A M Stanier 1989
>email alan@sx.ac.uk    Essex University    This article may be redistributed
>tel +44 206-872153     Colchester      <-- for profit only if such profit is
>FAX +44 206-860585     England CO4 3EA     sent to A M Stanier at this address

I can get around this one easily.  What if I offer a service where I
redistribute articles for free (or for cost).  The service I charge
you dearly for is the non-distribution of what I deem to be junk.
-- 
Andy Sherman/AT&T Bell Laboratories/Murray Hill, NJ           *NEW ADDRESS*
AUDIBLE:  (201) 582-5928                                      *NEW PHONE*
READABLE: andys@ulysses.ATT.COM  or att!ulysses!andys         *NEW EMAIL*
The views and opinions are my own.  Who else would want them? *OLD DISCLAIMER*