Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!oliveb!tymix!epimass!jbuck From: jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) Newsgroups: news.misc Subject: Re: Can Usenet be sued? (was Net problems -- Brad pro and con) Message-ID: <3324@epimass.EPI.COM> Date: 19 Jun 89 23:19:17 GMT References: <41197@bbn.COM> <12113@well.UUCP> <41207@bbn.COM> <632@biar.UUCP> <3305@epimass.EPI.COM> <2335@etive.ed.ac.uk> <309@lawnet.LawNet.Com> Reply-To: jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) Organization: Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, CA Lines: 15 In article <309@lawnet.LawNet.Com> greg@.LawNet.Com (Gregory G. Petersen) writes an article including the line "In article <3305@epimass.EPI.COM> jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) writes:" but nothing in the article in question was by me. Please, let's be careful with attributions, especially since I disagreed with most of the quoted article. Specifically, I have no concerns about ClariNet and don't think it will bring about lawsuits or The Death of The Net As We Know It. -- -- Joe Buck jbuck@epimass.epi.com, uunet!epimass.epi.com!jbuck