Xref: utzoo news.groups:10333 news.misc:3266 sci.misc:3646 talk.religion.newage:3500 talk.philosophy.misc:2550
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!bionet!ames!hc!pprg.unm.edu!unmvax!aplcen!arrom
From: arrom@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.misc,sci.misc,talk.religion.newage,talk.philosophy.misc
Subject: Re: Comments and Observations anent "Skepticism" (2)
Message-ID: <1663@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu>
Date: 23 Jun 89 04:33:54 GMT
References: <175@spectra.COM>
Reply-To: arrom@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee (600.429))
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Johns Hopkins University
Lines: 11

>... The history of science bears this out
>as has been clearly shown by Thomas Kuhn.  ...

If it was clear, we would not be arguing over it, now would we?  By definition,
if many intelligent, competent people cannot agree on it, it is not clear.
--
"The fact is self evident from the text and requires no supporting argument."
  --Tim Maroney

Kenneth Arromdee (UUCP: ....!jhunix!ins_akaa; BITNET: g49i0188@jhuvm;
     INTERNET: arromdee@crabcake.cs.jhu.edu) (please, no mail to arrom@aplcen)