Xref: utzoo news.misc:3214 news.sysadmin:2495
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!xanth!ames!amdahl!pacbell!ditka!bucket!whizz!alexc
From: alexc@whizz.uucp (Alex M. Chan)
Newsgroups: news.misc,news.sysadmin
Subject: Re: Official Legal Announcement regarding Apple's Source Code
Message-ID: <659@whizz.uucp>
Date: 17 Jun 89 19:43:39 GMT
References: <2073@astroatc.UUCP> <2928@csd4.milw.wisc.edu>
Reply-To: alexc@whizz.UUCP (Alex M. Chan)
Organization: McCormick & Hovell, Inc., Lake Oswego, OR
Lines: 18

In article <2928@csd4.milw.wisc.edu> jgd@csd4.milw.wisc.edu (John G Dobnick,EMS E380,4142295727,) writes:
>From article <2073@astroatc.UUCP>, by brown@astroatc.UUCP (Vidiot):
>
>I gather that Mac clones are immenent.  This brouhaha seems to put a 
>severe legal damper on release of such clones -- the clonemakers will 
>now have to prove they *didn't* have access to Apple source.  I see the
>potential for nasty copyright battles, possibly putting "look and feel"
>to shame.

	I agreed. But in my perosnal view, who would clone a MAC ?
	To me it sees to be just a toy for kids to play with or a
	fancy typing machine for people would like that "mouse" and those
	stupid sounds... and stuff...

 
                                Alex Chan 

USENET: ...!{sun!nosun|tektronix!percival}!whizz!alexc