Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: KopyriTe
Message-ID: <7133.8906240804@edai.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 24 Jun 89 12:15:56 GMT
Sender: daemon@eddie.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Lines: 33
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: Richard Caley <rjc%edai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK>

>Really-From: ide!lofdahl@Sun.COM (Corey Lofdahl)

>3) We let Kate decide.

>I vote for alternative #3.  

Ditto.

I don't give a damn for EMI's profits.

I can't really get worked up about whether KT doesn't get a few quid in
one of two ways. 

I can get worked up about MS Bush retaining control of what she ( no
doubt wonderfully ) created.

And the copyrite arguments are silly.  She does not have to tell him to
cease and desist - she can give one time rights ( as far as I know ) 
and that is that. This assumes she still has copyright on this stuff,
maybe she hasn't and she is obliged to tell EMI who chase us. 

I don't know. I doubt if anyone here does. Once again.

	      ************************
	      * LET THE LADY DECIDE! *
	      ************************

It's hers.  No one else has the right.  Including EMI - no matter what
sort of contraxct they have her in. 

( ps has my money gotten there yet? Huh? has the customs swallowed it? )