Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: ka2czu@cbnewsh.att.com (robert.switzer)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Biblical Creation
Message-ID: <Jun.24.01.34.48.1989.23921@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 24 Jun 89 05:34:49 GMT
Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 15
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu


I like the description of the implications of the two alternative views
of what is implied by Genesis,  although I didn't quite see how Psalm 104
supported the Theistic Evolution argument.  I guess in response I'd like
to point out the obvious...that Biblical Creationism does NOT preclude God
still being involved in the movement of every particle of the universe at
every moment in time.  I point this out because of some who would see God
as the "one who wound up the clock" and then just leftt the universe to run
on its own, interacting with the creation only at certain moments to
align with His purposes.  I'm not arguing pro or con, but am merely
pointing
this out.

Shalom,
Robert Switzer