Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!aber-cs!pcg From: pcg@aber-cs.UUCP (Piercarlo Grandi) Newsgroups: alt.sources Subject: Re: An apology, and a question (about uucp in Germany) Message-ID: <1031@aber-cs.UUCP> Date: 24 Jun 89 09:18:43 GMT Reply-To: pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) Organization: Dept of CS, UCW Aberystwyth (Disclaimer: my statements are purely personal) Lines: 29 In article <567@axis.fr> philip@axis.fr (Philip Peake) writes: This is where it becones interesting - apparently our German friend is an UNOFFICIAL site - which basically means someone is feeding him NEWS without declaring it - THIS IS ANTI-SOCIAL - the rest of us are paying more than we need to. One of the perenial complaints is that NEWS is too expensive here - no wonder it is expensive if it is only a small percentage of those actually using it who pay ! This is again the old fallacy. If the cost of getting news from the US is divided amongst all subscribers, then nobody has the incentive to feed other sites, as the reduction in charges has to be shared among all the existing sites. If the sites closest to the backbone pay for the news and ask for a reimbursment from other sites they feed, those that are keener on being feeds will split their costs with many, and so on, and this will encourage getting new subscribers. As the system stands now it is *forbidden* for a site to split its costs with those it feeds, it must share the benefit even with sites that don't want to feed anybody. In the end, this means that the only site that has an incentive in taking the trouble to feed is the national backbone, and other sites have little reason beyond goodwill to take the trouble to feed somebody because they are forced to share the benefit with everybody else. -- Piercarlo "Peter" Grandi | ARPA: pcg%cs.aber.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk Dept of CS, UCW Aberystwyth | UUCP: ...!mcvax!ukc!aber-cs!pcg Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, UK | INET: pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk