Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.modems:4043 comp.mail.uucp:3318
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ukc!axion!fulcrum!igb
From: igb@Fulcrum.BT.CO.UK (Ian G Batten)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: UUCP over X25 [Was Re: Telebits and uucp g-protocol]
Keywords: Telebit Trailblazers, g-protocol, uucp
Message-ID: <203@cat.Fulcrum.BT.CO.UK>
Date: 26 Jun 89 08:36:01 GMT
References: <335@nixtor.UUCP> <10391@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1989Jun12.185746.7217@eci386.uucp> <193@cat.Fulcrum.BT.CO.UK> <1989Jun22.154318.25599@eci386.uucp>
Reply-To: igb@fulcrum.bt.co.uk (Ian G Batten)
Organization: BT Fulcrum, Birmingham, England
Lines: 16

In article <1989Jun22.154318.25599@eci386.uucp> clewis@eci386.UUCP (Chris Lewis) writes:
>You mean you aren't using compressed batching?!  e is very dangerous
>unless you've carefully set up your PAD - a single binary character in
>the data could do all sorts of nasty things (at best, cause it to

Not using a PAD!  PSS modem straight into the back of the machine, X25
in the kernel.  It's 8-bit clean: we ship kernels in the raw. (With 'g',
admitedly.  BuT I think 'e' will work as well.)

ian


ian

-- 
Ian G Batten, BT Fulcrum - igb@fulcrum.bt.co.uk - ...!uunet!ukc!fulcrum!igb