Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!netsys!vector!telecom-gateway From: asuvax!gtephx!ellisond@ncar.ucar.edu (Dell Ellison) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: LD carrier span comparisons Message-ID: Date: 28 Jun 89 18:10:10 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Organization: AG Communication Systems, Phoenix, Arizona Lines: 19 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 220, message 6 of 10 In article , cblph!grs@att.att.com writes: > Steve Elias suggests that we discuss perceived quality on a carrier by > carrier basis for calls between various cities. This sounds like an > excellent topic. I would enjoy reading these accounts, I hope people > post some. This is *not* the sort of thing I flamed Dell Ellison about, > however. Posting shallow references to his corporation's widely > publicized media advertising campaign was what I thought to be a > bit out of line with the guidelines for technical discussion. U.S. Sprint is owned by GTE and Northern Telecom (and soon to be totally owned by Northern Telecom). The company that I work for is also partially owned by GTE. However, that does not mean that I have any affiliation with U.S. Sprint. I am NOT affiliated with U.S. Sprint. So please refrain from accusing others of 'tooting their own horn.' (Interesting that HE works for AT & T) (However, I Did enjoy his implication that flaming is a 'technical discussion.')