Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uc!nic.MR.NET!ns!hughes From: hughes@ns.network.com (Jim Hughes x1676) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: What price C++ ??? Keywords: C++, money, marketing, sales Message-ID: <1477@ns.network.com> Date: 30 Jun 89 22:32:05 GMT References: <50@eileen.samsung.com> <5668@pbhyf.PacBell.COM> Sender: hughes@ns.network.com (Jim Hughes x1676) Reply-To: hughes@ns.UUCP (Jim Hughes x1676) Organization: Network Systems Corporation Lines: 46 I feel quite let down. I like C++, I use C++. I HAD to buy the source for C++ to get the tasking library working. I, like Bjarne, wanted to do discrete simulations in a C style language, but in a language with SIMULA class structures. I am now using C++ and can not go back to SIMULA. The pricing structure is basically to allow AT&T to make money from people who are making money from selling C++ to end users. I have no problem with AT&T getting a proper return on their investment. I, however, am an end user. I have one C++ licence. I am NEVER going to sell a copy. As a matter of fact, I don't care about the source for cfront and munch. I am also running C++ on a machine where object code C++ is available for 1/2 the price I paid for the source. All I really care about is the libC source. I feel that for AT&T to ask $20,000 for the C++ (since I have a license, they only want $10K, thanks for the break chump) from someone who wants the source to insure that problems with the library doesn't stop development is robbery. For god sake, I want to help make the product better. Since AT&T's actions, I am forced to continue to use 1.2 until Sun (a $1 billion corp) finds the time to port 2.0. I have problems which I know for a fact are solved in 2.0. It would be a waste of time for me to fix these bugs in an obsolete compiler. My corporation has a Unix source licence. We do not port Unix. We use that licence to work on bugs. We payed AT&T $40K for that license. Are you telling me that C++ is 1/2 of all Unix?! I have told this to my AT&T rep, and it fell on deaf ears. He (more likely his bosses) are too busy counting their commisions to notice that a large population which can (does) help them is being locked out. Jim Hughes Hughes@network.com (Network Systems Corporations is not affiliated with the Network Systems division of AT&T. NSC is a netowrking company which markets HYPERchannel. These are my personal FLAMING opinions.)