Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!otc!metro!bunyip!brolga.cc.uq.oz!greg
From: greg@brolga.cc.uq.oz (Gregory R. Lehmann)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Why are postscript fonts so tight?
Message-ID: <1974@bunyip.cc.uq.OZ>
Date: 26 Jun 89 08:03:14 GMT
Sender: news@bunyip.cc.uq.OZ
Reply-To: greg@brolga.cc.uq.oz (Gregory R. Lehmann)
Organization: University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Lines: 13
Keywords:


It seems to me adobe have made a mistake with their fonts. They all
have an extremely annoying tendency to run together. The classic
example is burn which turns into bum when printed on our 2 laser
printers. Does anyone know why they have done this? I have heard
comments that it is not the fonts but the software that produces
the postscript. I have disproved this by writing my own postscript
program to print burn. I still got bum. I can't believe adobe
expect every piece of software to put extra space around every
character just to make the resulting text readable. Any other
theories?

Greg