Xref: utzoo comp.sources.bugs:1804 unix-pc.general:3196
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mailrus!ames!amdahl!pacbell!att!chinet!kdb
From: kdb@chinet.chi.il.us (Karl Botts)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs,unix-pc.general
Subject: Re: Compiling CRISP1.9 on UNIXPC
Message-ID: <8814@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 1 Jul 89 07:27:09 GMT
References: <1989Jun29.172536.3248@ivucsb.sba.ca.us>
Reply-To: kdb@chinet.chi.il.us (Karl Botts)
Followup-To: comp.sources.bugs
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 22

In article <1989Jun29.172536.3248@ivucsb.sba.ca.us> todd@ivucsb.sba.ca.us (Todd Day) writes:
>I'm having problems compiling CRISP on a UNIXPC (3.50).  I keep
>getting
>warning: enumeration type clash

I have crisp1.9 as it came over the net a couple of weeks ago compiled and
running.  I did not have the problem you mention but I do remember reading
something about it in the files--grep for "[Ee]numeration".

This sort of brings up another question: what are the C compiler options
for the 3b1?  Is there an ANSI compiler, short of GNU, available?
I just don't want to go through the struggle of bringing up a beta test
compiler, especially such a huge one.  Which brings up another question:
Why is all the GNU software so darned massive?  I guess I tend to mistrust
software which is the biggest by a factor of several in its department.
For programs, as for most works of literature, I tend to the view that all
other things being equal, smaller is better.  I note that the massive size
of the GNU software is not just all the pre-processor stuff to support so
many machines--half the messages on the net about it are people reporting
running out of memory or other resources at run-time.  So how come?

What is shcc?