Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!uflorida!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: size_t Message-ID: <10467@smoke.BRL.MIL> Date: 28 Jun 89 04:52:36 GMT References: <934@tukki.jyu.fi> <845@cbnewsl.ATT.COM> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 11 In article geoff@cs.warwick.ac.uk (Geoff Rimmer) writes: >Does this mean that size_t should be a #define rather than a typedef? No, size_t must be a genuine type name. >If it were a typedef, and I #include AND (which >is a perfectly reasonable thing to do!), I would get errors. It is the implementor's job to make sure that there is no such problem. I think it makes an interesting exercise to figure out how this can be implemented.