Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:35965 comp.sys.amiga.tech:5848
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!modcomp!srp
From: srp@modcomp.UUCP (Steve Pietrowicz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Request for testers for Color X11 for Amiga
Message-ID: <164@modcomp.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jun 89 16:40:25 GMT
References: <19763@cup.portal.com>
Distribution: usa
Lines: 21

in article <19763@cup.portal.com>, stephan@cup.portal.com (Stephen Derek Schaem) says:
>  My comments where only based on 'amiga being a good and inexpensive X 
> terminal'.(in GFX.).
>  If you are not looking for UNIX,Speed,good graphics{, performance in general
> X on the amiga  is perfect, but again I have to say it again ;it will not
> aply for other reason.Al my messages where based on that... I didn't say
> that X souldnt never be seen runing on an AMIGA but that people how want
> performance in general for a good price with X shouldnt think of the amiga.
>  Hope that make my thought clear to you:-){

It's always fun to see things like the above when people don't know what
the hell they're talking about.   1/2 :-)

From what you've been saying here in all your postings, it's obvious that
you've never seen X running on an Amiga, and it's even doubtful that you've
even used an Amiga for a significant amount of time. (And I'm talking a 
SIGNIFICANT amount of time, not a couple of hours at a local dealer).  If 
you're going to say things like this, get some facts (LIKE GO AND SEE IT) 
before you post articles.  (Better yet, don't post at all).
-- 
Stephen R. Pietrowicz    UUCP: ...!uunet!modcomp!srp      CIS: 73047,2313