Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpihoah!winch From: winch@hpihoah.HP.COM (Bill Winchester) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: A visit to WordPerfect Corp. Message-ID: <4640009@hpihoah.HP.COM> Date: 28 Jun 89 15:56:38 GMT References: <653dcanfield@yvax.byu.edu> Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino Lines: 86 The following note was posted by Morgan Davis last year. It describes how I feel about Appleworks vs Wordperfect very well. If you use a wordprocessor to write any LONG documents (books, papers, etc), Wordperfect is, IMHO, the better product currently. Morgan I hope you don't mind me reposting this! Bill Winchester ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- There's been mention of WordPerfect for the Apple being really incredulously slow -- and it's true. It's a dog. However, I'm talking about the IIe version. On the other hand, the IIGS version is very usable, and it doesn't take 7 seconds to go from the top of the page to the bottom, even though the GS version uses the super hi-res mode of the computer. I won't begin to describe the merits of WordPerfect GS, but I'll say this much about it in comparison to AppleWorks, which the Apple world is enthralled by. WordPrefect has WordPerfect Corporation behind it. AppleWorks has (nope, not Apple, but) Claris behind it. Think we'll see much support there? Think AppleWorks will become the writer's tool that we've all hoped for? Think again. Last year I wrote a 640 page book (Mastering the Apple IIGS Toolbox) using AppleWorks. My co-author, Dan Gookin, used his IBM PC with WordPerfect. Converting chapters between WP and AW was a pain, but it could be done at the expense of losing some formatting features in both directions. I ended up cursing AppleWorks a lot, simply because it just isn't a writer's tool. Not in the least. To be fair, I suppose I was actually disheartened by the entire Apple II word processing industry as a whole, and saddened that we've been held hostage by this five-year-old program, AppleWorks, as the only game in town. Imagine: five years of AppleWorks, while everyone else has benefitted from new software advances. Fortunately, those who embraced AppleWorks as the end-all/be-all word processor weren't as eager to latch onto the advent of floppy disk drives after their cassette tape predecessors. It's frightening to think that we might never have been able to explore the miracle of massive storage systems, and perhaps never would have left those weaning years on DOS 3.3. But all is not so cheery. If your senses are keen enough, perhaps you, too, can detect that pungent aroma of stagnation wafting by your computer's screen. >SIDEBAR> And aren't we lucky? Last month's A+ Magazine (Ziff/Davis) felt we were due for Yet Another Cover Story about AppleWorks. I just love getting A+'s in the mail and seeing 'APPLEWORKS!!!' splashed all over the front -- as if the program had just come out yesterday. Yawn. << And then it was time for me to move on, when the publisher said, "Good job on the first book, now do another one." Shudder to think that I'd go through all that again. By that time, however, this new beast, WordPerfect GS 2.0, was available. And, lo, the clouds burst open to let a wonderous ray of hope beam forth! Well, isn't that ... *extra special* ?!? Suddenly, word processor and writer were finally working together, instead of one constantly against the other. WordPerfect isn't as fast as AppleWorks, but it doesn't need to be. (It's a good thing AppleWorks is as fast as it is -- the less time I had to screw with it, the better). WordPerfect also made sharing files between my IIGS and my co-author's IBM PC a non-problem. The file format is totally compatible, and you don't have to do any file conversion at all, in either direction. All formatting codes are supported and retained. And this is nothing really to boast about when compared to the rest of the environment. It was a big deal to us, though. Yeah, this is a testimonial. You can take my word or leave it. But remember that I agonized through 640 pages, jealous all the while of what the rest of the world had at its disposal. The second volume of Mastering the Apple IIGS Toolbox (due out this summer) wasn't nearly as painful to write. And, I wasn't about to run out and buy an IBM PC. After all, we are so quick to emplore that the Apple can do anything the PC can do, and more. Right? I think it is (or will be) possible. Disklaimer: Perhaps WordPerfect Corporation will want to pay me for this plug. (Which is to say that I'm not being remunerated in any way for this diatribe). Now all we need is a really hot stand-alone spreadsheet and database program, and the Apple II world will shake itself from this deadly grip that AppleWorks has imposed upon all of us for half a decade. Let's move on folks. --Morgan Davis