Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!yale!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: LSP v2 compile error - string func
Message-ID: <2127@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 28 Jun 89 02:01:06 GMT
References: <342@vaxa.uwa.oz>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 25

In article <342@vaxa.uwa.oz> a_dent@vaxa.uwa.oz (ANDY DENT, PH: 09 380 2620) writes:
>The following is a copy of a unit declaration that reliably gets a compile 
>error for the implementation portion saying that "the type of the function 
>result doesn't match the earlier declaratation" which is funny because one is 

	Bizarre. It seems to be a real bug, all right.

	The workaround is not to repeat the parameter list. (You can
put braces around it if you need it for reference.)

		--R.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rich Siegel
 Staff Software Developer
 Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
 UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

 I classify myself as a real developer because my desk is hip-deep in
 assembly-language listings and I spend more than 50% of my time in TMON.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~