Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!ntanaka
From: ntanaka@ARAGORN.GANDALF.CS.CMU.EDU (Nobuyoshi Tanaka)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus
Subject: Re: GNUS vs. rn
Message-ID: <NTANAKA.89Jun30110705@ARAGORN.GANDALF.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: 30 Jun 89 15:07:05 GMT
References: <442@mqws2.fed.FRB.GOV>
	<RICH.89Jun29025958@sendai.sendai.ann-arbor.mi.us>
	<113255@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <ABAIR.89Jun30015555@turbinia.oakhill.uucp>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: abair@turbinia.oakhill.uucp's message of 30 Jun 89 06:55:55 GMT

In article <ABAIR.89Jun30015555@turbinia.oakhill.uucp>
abair@turbinia.oakhill.uucp (Alan Bair) writes:

   installing NNTP, does anyone know if it will be faster or slower than the
   NFS mounting method?

At first, I was using rn, and then switched to GNUS.  At that time, I
was using GNUS by something like NFS, it was very slow.  After that, I
switched to using NNTP, GNUS is much faster.  I don't know if GNUS via
NNTP is faster than rn or not.  But, it is fast enough.

This is my experience.