Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!intercon!amanda@intercon.uu.net From: amanda@intercon.uu.net (Amanda Walker) Newsgroups: news.misc Subject: Re: In Moderation Message-ID: <1149@intercon.UUCP> Date: 3 Jul 89 23:29:52 GMT References: <24AF7C38.8967@ateng.com> <24A91A67.28396@ateng.com> <3300@epimass.EPI.COM> <197600001@inmet> <14403@bfmny0.UUCP> <3749@viscous.sco.COM> <29-Jun-89.175917@192.41.214.248> Sender: news@intercon.UUCP Reply-To: amanda@intercon.uu.net (Amanda Walker) Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation Lines: 13 In article <24AF7C38.8967@ateng.com>, chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes: > All their customers could easily claim that since they already had my > article, IMN can't restrict them from redistributing it; thus IMN loses > subscribers and eventually disappears. (I hope.) Of course, they could just restrict redistribution of their cancel messages (via copyright :-)?)... This is getting (?) silly, folks... -- Amanda Walker InterCon Systems Corporation