Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!draken!tut!kannel!kannel.lut.fi!kim
From: kim@kannel.lut.fi (Kimmo Suominen)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Re^2: Proliferation of "Re^n:" in subject lines
Message-ID: <KIM.89Jul4095723@kannel.lut.fi>
Date: 4 Jul 89 13:57:23 GMT
References: <272@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> <WISNER.89Jul2113412@anableps.berkeley.edu>
	<401@umigw.MIAMI.EDU>
Sender: news@kannel.lut.fi
Organization: Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland
Lines: 20
In-reply-to: aem@ibiza.cs.miami.edu's message of 3 Jul 89 17:00:30 GMT

In article <401@umigw.MIAMI.EDU> aem@ibiza.cs.miami.edu (a.e.mossberg) writes:

   From: aem@ibiza.cs.miami.edu (a.e.mossberg)
   Newsgroups: news.misc
   Date: 3 Jul 89 17:00:30 GMT
   Lines: 17

   Personally I think it's elegant. Alot more attractive than 
   "Re: Re: re: re: Re: Re: guns and the NRA (was: guns guns guns guns guns)"
   or somesuch.

I never (NEVER) seem to get multiple Re's on the subject line and I've never
seen them (only Re: Re^x).

Kim
--
 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
( Kimmo Suominen              Electronic Mail on Internet:  kim@kannel.lut.fi )
( "That's what I think!"                         on Funet:  KUULA::KIM        )
 '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''