Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!uwvax!rutgers!mit-eddie!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: (none)
Message-ID: <8906300819.AA04144@uunet.uu.net>
Date: 30 Jun 89 01:07:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@eddie.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Organization: Love-Hounds Anonymous
Lines: 27
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: microsoft!stevesc@uunet.uu.net

To: uunet!rec-music-gaffa
Path: microsoft!stevesc
From: stevesc@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Schonberger)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: More Ethical Shit Hits the Fan
Message-ID: <6199@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 30 Jun 89 04:06:59 GMT
References: <18255@mimsy.UUCP> <15312.8906261354@edai.ed.ac.uk>
Reply-To: stevesc@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Schonberger)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 12


In article <15312.8906261354@edai.ed.ac.uk> Richard Caley <rjc%edai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK> writes:
>And if the US constitution can't distinguish copyright from patent law
>then it has even more problems than I previously thorght.

I suspect that one of our citizens, who often don't understand our laws
as well as they might proclaim, are the ones with problems, rather than
our constitution.  It has its problems, but failing to distinguish such
things as copyrights and patents are not among them.  The writers of it
have been much more careful and knowledgable than most people who write
things on the net.

	Steve