Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!cbnews!military From: johnson@gregsun.cs.umd.edu (Greg Johnson ) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Dogfighting Message-ID: <7779@cbnews.ATT.COM> Date: 27 Jun 89 02:38:38 GMT References: <7471@cbnews.ATT.COM> <7514@cbnews.ATT.COM> <7671@cbnews.ATT.COM> Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Lines: 46 Approved: military@att.att.com From: johnson@gregsun.cs.umd.edu (Greg Johnson ) In article <7671@cbnews.ATT.COM> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes: > >"VIFFing" is Vectoring In Forward Flight. It was invented some years >earlier, by the USMC Harrier pilots I believe. > > Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology > uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu There have been some research efforts in recent years on jet fighters with high maneuverability. HIMAT and the X-31 come to mind. The X-31 uses thrust vectoring around the nozzle at the rear of the airplane to maneuver in post-stall flight. I read an intriguing article in a popular science magazine about the X-31. It can evidently do amazing, bizarre things. It seems that it can enter a stall and then turn around using thrust vectoring. Detaching air flow seems to be a wonderful way to increase maneuverability. Some questions: What sorts of air combat encounters are such airplanes optimized for? Close-in gun engagements? If so, how frequent are such encounters? The experts were for a while predicting the demise of in-close dogfighting; has opinion swung in the other direction? As I understand it, the F-4 was originally deployed in Viet Nam as a missiles-only platform, but poor results and pleas from pilots resulted in modifications to include guns for in-close fighting. Missiles and radar have improved substantially since the Viet Nam era, but rules for visual confirmation of targets before firing have come into the picture. So where does all this leave us? What does the future of aerial combat look like, and how does high maneuverability fit in? To make this set of questions impossibly general, how will intelligent cockpits change the nature of ACM? - Greg Johnson johnson@mimsy.umd.edu When you turn an ordinary page of code into just a handful of instructions for speed, expand the comments to keep the number of source lines constant. - Mike Morgan, taken from Jon Bentley's More Programming Pearls - Greg Johnson johnson@mimsy.umd.edu When you turn an ordinary page of code into just a handful of instructions for speed, expand the comments to keep the number of source lines constant. - Mike Morgan, taken from Jon Bentley's More Programming Pearls