Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!voder!berlioz!andrew
From: andrew@berlioz (Lord Snooty @ The Giant Poisoned Electric Head )
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: [David E Demers: Re: free will]
Summary: gobbledegook
Message-ID: <425@berlioz.nsc.com>
Date: 15 Jul 89 03:42:28 GMT
References: <334@ucl-cs.UUCP>
Organization: National Semiconductor, Santa Clara
Lines: 20

In article <334@ucl-cs.UUCP>, Robert@ucl-cs.UUCP writes:
> Is `free will' any different from `will'? The discussion about `free will' 
> and `determinism' may become clarified by developing the distinction
> between 'free will' and `will'. Or then again it may not, whichever
> the case may be.

I coincidentally just caught a line from the group "Yes" (I think) which
goes:	"Then I will choose free will".

While I am not suggesting that pop contains any deep truisms (or not), when
I heard this I wondered 
a) if he >has< free will, then the choice is specious
b) else, how can he choose?

Just a little light relief from
-- 
...................................................................
Andrew Palfreyman	I should have been a pair of ragged claws
nsc!berlioz!andrew	Scuttling across the floors of silent seas
...................................................................