Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!neoucom!gto
From: gto@neoucom.UUCP (Thomas Osterfield)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: Missing Parts - Why?
Summary: maybe not
Message-ID: <1685@neoucom.UUCP>
Date: 18 Jul 89 12:59:13 GMT
References: <2286@cbnewsh.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: gto@neoucom.UUCP (Thomas Osterfield)
Distribution: na
Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine
Lines: 13

In article <2286@cbnewsh.ATT.COM> twb@cbnewsh.ATT.COM (thomas.w.beattie) writes:
>
>Why are there so many instances of missing parts on c.b.i.p?
>
Undoubtedly there are often missing parts, usually the result
of weak links (temporarily, of course) in the network
(transmission chain) -- but often the parts just come out of
order.  (If part one of kfortune is indeed missing, however,
I'd like a copy.)

-- 
G. Thomas Osterfield archivist (216)325-2511 x531 CIS:74106,1153
gto@neoucom.UUCP            {cwjcc,pitt,hal,scooter}!neoucom!gto