Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!husc6!rutgers!netsys!vector!telecom-gateway From: mvac23!thomas@cs.utexas.edu (Thomas Lapp) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Praise the Lord and pass the RF filters Message-ID: Date: 7 Jul 89 00:15:08 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Reply-To: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu Lines: 14 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 226, message 10 of 11 > Now AM stations, that brings out the old WLW stories. > WLW is the clear channel station in Cincinnati. Before > the FCC cut them back to 50kw, they were rumored to run > 500+. Farmers working on barbed wire fences heard them. I thought I saw somewhere that AM stations were limited to 50kW max in the US. I believe that shortwave stations are AM as well, and are permitted much higher powers. I would think that they would have the same effect near their multi-tower antennae. - tom ============================================================================== uucp: ...!udel!mvac23!thomas ! Internet: mvac23!thomas@udel.edu Location: Newark, DE, USA ! or mvac23%thomas@udel.edu ==============================================================================