Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!apple!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!nuchat!moray!urchin!p6.f506.n106.z1.fidonet.org!Bob.Stout
From: Bob.Stout@p6.f506.n106.z1.fidonet.org (Bob Stout)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Turbo C 2.0 vs MSC 5.1
Message-ID: <17190.24C323FF@urchin.fidonet.org>
Date: 17 Jul 89 15:25:30 GMT
Sender: ufgate@urchin.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:106/506.6 - Fulcrum's Edge, Spring TX
Lines: 12

In an article of <14 Jul 89 13:02:11 GMT>, (cliff click) writes:

 >True; don't use 5.0, get 5.1.  It does produce better code than TC 2.0,
 >just alot more slowly.  
 >
 >I use TC 2.0 for all my development, and MSC 5.1 for the final release 
 >code.

I use Zortech C 1.07 with the optimization turned off for all my development  
(compiles at about the same speed as TC 2.0), then turn on optimization for  
the final release version with code quality comparable to (often better than)  
MSC. Same result, one compiler - savings > $400...