Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!scifi!njs
From: njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.headers
Subject: Re: MH verses the "all in one file" MUAs
Message-ID: <682@scifi.UUCP>
Date: 9 Jul 89 14:20:31 GMT
References: <113461@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1518@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> <18916@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU>
Reply-To: njs@scifi.UUCP (Nicholas J. Simicich)
Distribution: na
Organization: Nick Simicich, Peekskill, NY
Lines: 17

In article <18916@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU> ut6y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (The Dread Pirate Mikey (Mike Shappe)) writes:
>The final advantage is simply that it is compatible with normal Berkley Mail.
>This may not seem important until you realize that there are times when one
>has to, for whatever reason, resort to old Mail/Mailx.

I think that I can say that this isn't true in my case.  And I know
many other people who do all of their mailing on Unix (AIX) who use
mh-mode in GNUemacs, rmail mode in GNUemacs, or XMH, and who never use
the Berkley mail command.

Me?  I like RMAIL mode....




-- 
Nick Simicich --- uunet!bywater!scifi!njs --- njs@ibm.com (Internet)