Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!philapd!ssp15!jos
From: jos@idca.tds.PHILIPS.nl (Jos Vos)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: MH verses the "all in one file" MUAs
Message-ID: <1134@ssp15.idca.tds.philips.nl>
Date: 7 Jul 89 15:00:06 GMT
References: <113461@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1518@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> <113567@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <13801@ncoast.ORG>
Organization: Philips Telecommunication and Data Systems, The Netherlands
Lines: 27

In article <13801@ncoast.ORG> allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery) writes:

>As quoted from <113567@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> by argv%eureka@Sun.COM (Dan Heller):
>+---------------
>| Upon further investigation, I learned that MH wasn't portable to any other
>| unix besides BSD systems.  This may have changed lately -- I don't keep up
>| with MH that much (my loss, I guess).  Is it true that MH still only talks
>| to sendmail as its sole MTA?
>+---------------
>
>Tell it to ncoast, which is AT&T System *III* (_not_ System V!).

Tell it to me. I'm probably dreaming until now. Nice dream with System V.2,
V.3.0, V.3.1 and V.3.2 systems... (pure MH 6.6

Ok. I made some *small* (really!) adaptions which I partly did
send to bug-mh already, and partly will send in the next weeks.
(E.g. supporting V.3 directory access routines.)
Maybe they will be included in the patch promised in comp.mail.mh.

The patches for letting MH work with an available TCP/IP implementation
on System V systems are planned to be done in the next weeks.
I already investigated the problem areas and I think it will be easy.

-- 
-- ######   Jos Vos   ######   Internet   jos@idca.tds.philips.nl   ######
-- ######             ######   UUCP         ...!mcvax!philapd!jos   ######