Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!rutgers!apple!tahoe!malc From: malc@tahoe.unr.edu (Malcolm L. Carlock) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: 5.61 wierdness on our machines Message-ID: <2336@tahoe.unr.edu> Date: 7 Jul 89 10:52:29 GMT Reply-To: malc@tahoe.unr.edu (Malcolm L. Carlock) Organization: Univ. of Nev., Reno-Mathematics Lines: 50 We are currently running an older version of sendmail here, which does everything we need except for MX-handling. Thus, I have been trying to bring up sendmail 5.61 on two machines here, a Vax and a Tahoe, both running BSD 4.3. However, whenever I fire up 5.61, on either machine, I see some seriously odd sendmail behavior. To wit: The two major problems: - mail to user@host, where host is either a local ether host or a remote tcp host, fails with an "unknown host user@host" message. This happens whether a name server is running or not. - mail to local users (on the same machine), arrives with the headers looking like this: (I have indented the following text by a single tabstop) From malc Fri Jul 7 02:47:23 1989 Ceived: by unrvax.unr.edu (5.61/smail2.5/10-13-87) id AA17962; Fri, 7 Jul 89 02:47:20 -0700 Te: Fri, 7 Jul 89 02:47:20 -0700 Om: Ssage-`: <8907070947.AA17962@unrvax.unr.edu> `: Bject: test Status: RO I have tried running our current "old" sendmail in daemon mode, calling the new sendmail as required. Remote hosts are contacted correctly in this case, and MX records are utilized (the big reason we are trying to change over). However, the headers arrive at the remote host munged as shown above. I've been wondering if the problem is in sendmail.cf, but if it is, I'm stumped as to what it could be. The current "old" sendmail works fine with the .cf file we have now. The libc.a on both machines has been updated based on the patches in the bind 4.8 package. However, the same 5.61 problems appeared using the old version of libc.a as well. The 4.3 machines I'm trying to bring 5.61 up on are a Vax 11/750 and a Sperry 7000 (tahoe architecture). 5.61 produces the abovedescribed oddities on both of these machines in precisely the same manner. I did a vanilla make depend/sendmail/install on both machines. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Malcolm Carlock malc@unrvax.unr.edu uunet!unrvax!malc