Xref: utzoo comp.std.misc:141 comp.realtime:118 comp.arch:10546 comp.os.misc:969 comp.misc:6509
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!arnor!uri
From: uri@arnor.UUCP (Uri Blumenthal)
Newsgroups: comp.std.misc,comp.realtime,comp.arch,comp.os.misc,comp.misc
Subject: Re: TRON (a little long)
Message-ID: <252@arnor.UUCP>
Date: 7 Jul 89 14:34:05 GMT
References: <Jul.7.01.19.39.1989.7792@pilot.njin.net>
Organization: IBM Corp., Yorktown NY
Lines: 16

From article <Jul.7.01.19.39.1989.7792@pilot.njin.net>, by limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli):
>> Sorry, but I don't remember such terminology in Computer Science - ugly,
>> nice, beautiful...
> 
> Strange.  ...........  I guess that's
> what I get for being a CS major at a liberal arts college.
> 
> I recommend you read "A Mathematician's Appology" by G.H. Hardy for a
> "technical" definition of "ugly".

Thanks, Tom. I can't help but to recommend you to read some books on CS, in
my turn. It may enrich your lexicon with some "real" technical terms - so
we'll not need to seek "technical" definition for UGLY. So be professional,
please (I mean -even more (:-) - in CS, not in liberal arts...

Uri.